AAP tells Delhi HC amendments to deal with chain snatching not required
The AAP government today told the Delhi High Court that the Centre has informed it that amendment of penal law to deal with the issue of chain snatching was not required.
A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar asked the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Delhi government to file affidavits indicating their stand on the issue and listed the matter for further hearing on October 30.
The bench was hearing a petition by advocate Prashant Manchanda who has alleged that incidents of chain snatching in the city have seen a six-fold rise leading to a "fear psychosis" in the minds of citizens as well as tourists who are also targeted by the perpetrators.
During the hearing, the petitioner contended that the Delhi Police was booking the offenders of such crimes in a routine manner under milder provisions which entail a punishment of only up to three years.
He said even without a specific offence under the law to make snatching a separate offence, the offenders could be booked under section 390 (robbery) of the IPC as it uses the word 'fear of wrongful restraint' and carries a jail term of up to 10 years.
On this aspect, the Delhi Police, represented by advocate Gautam Narayan, opposed the petitioner's contention and told the court that it was booking offenders under IPC Section 390 wherever applicable.
The petition has claimed that on an average, there were 25 snatching cases every day in the national capital due to "absence of effective laws" and "indifference" of the police.
"Many incidents of snatching entail serious wounds and also involve use of deadly weapons, leading to fatal injuries or death of the victims," it has said.
(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)