Second referendum would only divide UK further -Brexit minister
Work and Pensions Secretary Amber Rudd said last month there would be a "plausible argument" for another referendum if parliament failed to reach a consensus on the way forward, something Prime Minister Theresa May has repeatedly ruled out.
Barclay echoed May's view.
"A second referendum would cause yet more division," he told German daily Die Welt. "The current extent to which Britain is divided now would be small compared to the tensions that a second vote would cause. It would further divide our nation."
The future of a Brexit agreement that May negotiated with the EU hangs in the balance in the run-up to a parliamentary vote, and calls for a second referendum - which she has consistently rejected - are growing.
Brexit is scheduled for March 29.
"But then, European elections would have to take place in Britain," he added. "Which means huge democratic damage, because people voted for a withdrawal but would have to nonetheless vote again at the end of May."
"Our European colleagues couldn't have any interest in it (a second referendum) either as that would trigger a very populist reaction," he said.
British lawmakers must choose whether to accept May's plans for a structured exit and relatively close economic ties to the EU, or reject it and spawn huge uncertainty about the country's next steps. The vote is due in the week beginning Jan. 14. (Writing by Paul Carrel Editing by James Dalgleish)
(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
- Divided US SC stops restrictive Louisiana abortion law from going into effect
- 69th BIFF: European Film Market officials interested to work with India
- Russia wants European countries to reap benefits of Nord Stream 2
- European stocks almost steady on pessimism led by slowdown concerns
- Britain trying to block EU plan to put Saudi on terror financing list