Devdiscourse
Development News Edition
Give Feedback
VisionRI - Urban Development

World Water Day: How small water enterprises depend on government

In essence, most small water (and sanitation) enterprises operate in a legal and regulatory gray zone, outside of the regulated and utility-provided mainstream.


World Bank PATRICK MORIARTY
Updated: 22-03-2019 21:40 IST
World Water Day: How small water enterprises depend on government

This means that small water enterprises rely on a range of cobbled together, legally dubious, local agreements (typically with local governments). Image Credit: Flickr

World Water Day is always a good time to take stock of where we are in achieving the water-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Most PPPs relate to relatively large investments in major infrastructure run by utilities. But in the developing world's rapidly growing small towns and urban peripheries, we need something else. Enter safe (also called small) water enterprises, an exciting group of dedicated social entrepreneurs who are beginning to gain traction providing high-quality water to communities not served by utilities. For example, our friends at Safe Water Network recently announced they are now serving more than a million people in India and Ghana (more about that in this blog.) A 2017 report by Dalberg suggested a potential market of 3.9 billion people for safe water enterprises.

A commonality among these enterprises is a dedication to professional management and focus on the twin bottom lines of providing high-quality service while covering costs. On this latter point, although aspiring to attract private funding and, eventually, achieve profitability (itself a necessary precursor for attracting funding) the reality is that most are heavily subsidized through philanthropic or other sources, especially for capital investments.

Clearly, this is limiting and means they are struggling to scale-up despite often running fairly exemplary businesses. Why is this so? I keep coming back to the systems-level challenge they face. At risk of oversimplifying, I think that, in focusing on getting the business side right at the enterprise level, most of these enterprises are putting insufficient effort into engaging with the broader system in which the enterprises function. This broader system goes under many names: the market, the enabling environment, the regulatory environment.

In essence, most small water (and sanitation) enterprises operate in a legal and regulatory gray zone, outside of the regulated and utility-provided mainstream. This, contradictorily, permits the flexibility to experiment with a wide range of tariff and business models, yet provides an almost insurmountable barrier to growth. Why? Primarily because operating in a public and social sector means that their ability to charge is strongly limited. As a result, getting close to recovering capital costs typically requires a timeframe of 15 to 20 years—or longer. Yet few (if any) countries provide the legal and regulatory frameworks for small private operators to run secure concessions for this length of time.

This means that small water enterprises rely on a range of cobbled together, legally dubious, local agreements (typically with local governments). The result, as for so many other models for rural and informal WASH (water, sanitation, and hygiene) services, is that there is no viable model for crowding-in the private capital that we are so often told is the only solution to meeting the WASH SDGs. After all, what private investor would provide a company with a 20-year loan where ownership of assets is unclear?

I came away from a recent meeting with a group of committed safe water enterprise pioneers at Stanford University think they have much to offer the sector, not least in their focus on professionalization and delivery of quality service. But, also feeling they are not immune from the hard systems-level challenges of our sector: providing a service that is also a human right in a politicized and weakly developed regulatory and legal environment.

It's not that there isn't room for the private sector to provide WASH services in the semi-formal landscape of secondary towns and urban peripheries. Rather, the private sector faces the same systems-level challenges as the public, municipal, or community-managed sector.

Addressing those challenges is, above all, the responsibility of governments (supported by their development partners). If small water and sanitation enterprises are trying to understand one part of the service provision challenge, only government can provide the other: an enabling environment that allows service providers to thrive, while holding them accountable. External agencies, international financial institutions such as the World Bank Group, and others who wish to support and convince the private sector to move into such spaces, need to also engage to help to build that enabling environment.

We just partnered with Water.org and the World Bank on a paper about mobilizing finance for WASH that unpacks what is meant by the enabling environment and presents real examples of how innovators are overcoming these bottlenecks in the sector.


POST A COMMENT