NHRC Denied Accreditation Yet Again by Global Human Rights Body
GANHRI has postponed the reaccreditation of NHRC, India, due to concerns about compliance with international human rights standards. GANHRI monitors compliance with the Paris Principles, which outline the independence and effectiveness of National Human Rights Institutions. NHRC, India, was initially accredited in 1999 but faces scrutiny over potential government interference, leading to the deferral of reaccreditation for the second consecutive year.
![NHRC Denied Accreditation Yet Again by Global Human Rights Body](https://devdiscourse.blob.core.windows.net/imagegallery/27_06_2019_15_03_33_2835321.png)
- Country:
- India
The Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI) has deferred the reaccreditation of NHRC, India for the second year in a row.
Geneva-based GANHRI, through its Sub-Committee on Accreditation (SCA), is responsible for reviewing and accrediting NHRIs (National Human Rights Institutions) in compliance with the Paris Principles.
It is a ''rigorous, peer-based process, undertaken by representatives of NHRIs from each of the four regions: Africa, Americas, Asia Pacific and Europe'', according to the website of GANHRI.
GANHRI has deferred the reaccreditation of NHRC (National Human Rights Commission) during its review meeting recently, sources said.
Last year, the review of the NHRC, India, which was due in March 2023 for its reaccreditation, had been deferred for a year, they said.
The deferral means no final decision has been taken as yet, a source said.
In accordance with the UN Paris Principles and the GANHRI Statute, two classifications for accreditation are used by GANHRI: 'A' -- fully compliant with the Paris Principles; and 'B' -- partially compliant with the Paris Principles.
The NHRC, India established in 1993 had got 'A' status of accreditation the first time in 1999, which it retained in 2006 and 2011 reviews. It was under the process of review for 2016, which was deferred to second session in November, 2017 during which, the Sub Committee on Accreditation of GANHRI recommended that the NHRC, India be again given 'A' status, according to a statement issued by the NHRC in 2018.
GANHRI, too, was set up in 1993. At an international workshop held in Tunis, Tunisia on December 13, 1993, a group of NHRIs set the foundation for the global network of national human rights institutions, known today as the GANHRI.
Accreditation takes into account compliance with Paris Principles among other factors.
The Paris Principles, as they came to be known, set out the roles, responsibilities and minimum standards for NHRIs to be considered independent and effective. The Paris Principles quickly received broad support within the UN human rights system. They were endorsed by the Vienna World Conference on Human Rights and the UN General Assembly in 1993.
The NHRC was set up under the Protection of Human Rights Act, passed by Parliament in 1993.
Reacting to the development, Congress leader P Chidambaram said it is ''sad and a shame'' that the GANHRI has declined accreditation to the NHRC. ''The status of NHRC as an accredited Human Rights body was suspended in 2023 and now again in 2024. The GANHRI has concluded that India's NHRC has failed to satisfy the international body that the NHRC is 'able to operate independent of government interference'. That is a rebuke to the NHRC and the government of India,'' Chidambaram said in a post on X on Tuesday, However, the sources maintained that deferral means no final decision has been taken as yet.
(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
ALSO READ
BJP Rules Out Pre-Poll Alliance in Jammu and Kashmir, Engages Independents
India has independent ties with both Russia and Ukraine: MEA on PM Modi's visit to Ukraine this week.
Govt Finalizes Framework to Strengthen Oversight of Oranga Tamariki with Independent Children's Commissioner
Fractal Appoints Janaki Akella as Independent Director to Drive AI Innovation
WCA Launches Independent Review to Address Cricket's 'Chaotic' Structure