Pak court strikes down colonial-era ‘sedition’ law

A Pakistani court on Thursday struck down a controversial colonial-era sedition law that criminalised criticism of the government and the state, terming it repugnant to the fundamental rights of the citizens protected in the Constitution.

Justice Shahid Karim of the Lahore High Court (LHC) annulled the offence of sedition under section 124-A of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) while delivering the verdict on a batch of petitions that argued it was being used by ruling political parties against their rivals.

Main petitioner Haroon Farooq said the impugned law of sedition originally was drafted in 1837 by Thomas Macaulay, the British historian-politician, but was omitted when the Indian Penal Code was enacted in 1860.

"Thereafter, in 1870 the same law was inserted in Indian Penal Code, 1860 through Penal Code (Amendment) Act, 1870 by James Stephen when the colonial masters felt the need to perpetuate their imperial rule," he said, adding it is one of the many draconian laws brought into force to suppress any voices of dissent at that time.

The law of sedition as contained in section 124-A was a residue and relic of the oppressive colonial legacy which had been introduced to rule the subjects not citizens, therefore, the provisions of the impugned section were repugnant to the constitutional guarantees including freedom of speech, movement, assembly, association and expression provided under Articles 15, 16, 17 and 19 of the Constitution, the petitioner said.

The petitioner's counsel argued that the word 'government' as exists in section 124-A, PPC was surely and squarely defeated the freedoms which were created by the Constitution.

"The impugned section be declared void and ultra vires being inconsistent with and in derogation of fundamental rights in view of the mandate of Article 8 of the Constitution," he pleaded.

After hearing the arguments, the court struck down the offence of sedition, terming it repugnant to the fundamental rights of the citizens protected in the Constitution.

The law states: "Whoever by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards, the Federal or Provincial Government established by law shall be punished with imprisonment for life to which fine may be added, or with imprisonment which may extend to three years, to which fine may be added, or with fine." The petition stated that the Constitution of Pakistan gives every citizen the right to freedom of expression but still, Section 124-A is imposed for making speeches against the rulers.

According to the petition, the law has been recklessly used in Pakistan as a tool of exploitation to curb the right to free speech and expression guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution.

The petition said the law was serving as "a notorious tool for the suppression of dissent, free speech and criticism in free and independent Pakistan".

Over the past few years, the petition argued, various politicians, journalists and activists had been booked under Section 124-A of the PPC.

"Every passing day, the intensity of registration of FIRs under this section is snowballing while the people of Pakistan have suffered a lot, as almost every criticism of the government or state institutions has been treated as an offence under Section 124-A by law enforcement agencies."

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)