Supreme Court's Landmark SC/ST Sub-Classification Verdict Sparks Varied Reactions

The Supreme Court's historic decision to sub-classify SCs and STs for more targeted quotas has received mixed reactions from Parliament members. The verdict, passed by a 7-judge bench, is seen as a step towards social justice but raises concerns about implementation without a caste census. Lawmakers emphasize the importance of accurate data for fair execution.

In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court has decided to sub-classify Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) to allocate separate quotas for more backward groups within these categories. The decision, passed by a 7-judge bench with a 6:1 majority, was declared compliant with Article 14 of the Constitution, which ensures equality before the law. Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud highlighted the inherent heterogeneity within these groups.

Members of Parliament had varied reactions. Lok Sabha MP Chandrashekhar Azad expressed concerns about implementation without a caste census, while Congress MP Pappu Yadav emphasized the necessity for accurate data. BJP MP Brij Lal welcomed the ruling for addressing economic disparities within SC/ST communities, and Congress MP Sukhdev Bhagat supported the verdict's alignment with constitutional principles.

The decision has reignited discussions around caste-based census and equitable reservations, highlighting the need for clarity and thorough implementation to address historical injustices and uplift disadvantaged communities effectively.

(With inputs from agencies.)