Supreme Court Explores Alternatives for Man in Vegetative State

The Supreme Court is considering alternative treatments for Harish Rana, who has been in a vegetative state since 2013. Instead of passive euthanasia, which is not permissible, the court is exploring options to shift him to a government hospital. The case highlights the struggle of his aging parents.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday sought the Centre's response on a plea by a couple whose 30-year-old son has been in a vegetative state since 2013 after head injuries.

Instead of allowing passive euthanasia, the court will explore shifting the patient to a government hospital for treatment and care.

A bench comprising Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra agreed with the Delhi High Court's finding that passive euthanasia is not permissible as Harish Rana is not on life-support. The court is considering humanitarian solutions for his care.