Fed's Policy Rift: To Cut or Not to Cut Rates?

A divide has emerged within the Federal Reserve over the decision to cut interest rates, sparking debate on future policy amidst economic uncertainties. Fed President Logan and Cleveland Fed's Hammack expressed reservations, while Governor Waller advocates further rate cuts due to labor market concerns.

The Federal Reserve faces internal contention as disparities widen over its recent decision to cut interest rates. While notable figures like Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan and Cleveland Fed's Beth Hammack voiced concerns over further rate cuts, Fed Governor Christopher Waller is advocating for their necessity due to labor market stagnation.

Jerome Powell, with six months left as Fed Chair, is tasked with navigating these diverging perspectives. Logan opposed the rate cuts, emphasizing the need for evidence of inflation cooling before considering future reductions. Hammack echoed the sentiment, suggesting current rates are nearing neutrality.

Conversely, Waller, a permanent voter, stressed the importance of maintaining rate cuts to stimulate the labor market, despite inflation predictions. The rift has also impacted market predictions, influencing December rate cut expectations following Powell's remarks about the prevailing divergent views.

(With inputs from agencies.)