Linguistic Debate: Empowerment or Imposition?

Opposition leaders criticized Home Minister Amit Shah's remarks on English, arguing it empowers the poor, while accusing the BJP of discouraging its learning. They emphasized English's role in employment and equality, defending linguistic diversity against alleged cultural majoritarianism. Shah's comments were seen as restricting linguistic empowerment by Congress and other parties.

Opposition leaders expressed criticism towards Home Minister Amit Shah for his statements implying that English is a tool of empowerment, not shame. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi accused the BJP of not wanting poor children to learn English, as it provides equality and empowerment.

Gandhi argued that English bridges divides rather than creating them and is essential for India's global competitiveness. Several other leaders, including Jairam Ramesh and Derek O'Brien, emphasized the importance of India's linguistic diversity and questioned the motives of the BJP in discouraging English literacy.

CPI leader P Sandosh Kumar and Kerala ministers added that English is necessary for modern communication. They warned against political attempts to impose uniformity and diminish India's diverse linguistic heritage, with English providing economic and social advantages.

(With inputs from agencies.)