Controversy Surrounds Film 'Udaipur Files' Involving Kanhaiya Lal Murder

The Delhi High Court questioned the Centre's authority to demand six cuts in 'Udaipur Files - Kanhaiya Lal Tailor Murder' using its revisional powers under the Cinematograph Act. This raises concerns regarding the film's potential impact on a fair trial for the accused. The court proceedings continue.

The Delhi High Court has questioned the Centre's authority in directing six cuts in the movie 'Udaipur Files - Kanhaiya Lal Tailor Murder,' invoking its power under the Cinematograph Act. The court insists that revisional powers must adhere strictly to statutory boundaries, without overstepping legal limits.

The court's enquiry follows contentions from Mohammed Javed, an accused in the case, that the film's release might jeopardize his right to a fair trial. With the Centre suggesting additional cuts beyond the censor board's suggestions, legal experts are scrutinizing the application of Section 6, which grants revisional powers over film certification.

This case underscores a conflict between creative expression and judicial fairness, as the judiciary tries to balance the production's narrative with ongoing legal proceedings. The final decision, to be discussed further on August 1, will set a precedent for future cases involving media portrayal of high-profile trials.

(With inputs from agencies.)