Protecting the Constitution: Lessons from Kesavananda Bharati

Justice Rohinton Nariman, a former Supreme Court judge, has warned against diluting the 'basic structure' doctrine of the Indian Constitution, suggesting it could lead to events akin to the Jallianwala Bagh massacre. His book discusses the pivotal Kesavananda Bharati case, which protects fundamental rights by limiting constitutional amendments.

Protecting the Constitution: Lessons from Kesavananda Bharati
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

In a stark warning, former Supreme Court judge Justice Rohinton Nariman cautioned that any dilution of the 'basic structure' doctrine of the Constitution could lead to catastrophic events similar to the Jallianwala Bagh massacre.

Justice Nariman was speaking at the launch of his book, 'The Basic Structure Doctrine: Protector of Constitutional Integrity,' highlighting the crucial role of the historically significant 1973 Kesavananda Bharati judgment, which asserts that the Constitution's core is unamendable and open to judicial review.

During the book's panel discussion, Supreme Court judge Justice K V Viswanathan lauded its comprehensive examination of the case, emphasizing the enduring importance of the basic structure doctrine in safeguarding fundamental rights beyond the reach of majority rule or national referenda.

Give Feedback

Use this form for editorial or site feedback. We usually reply within 2 to 3 working days.

By submitting, you agree that we may use your email address to respond.