Myanmar Challenges Genocide Accusations at UN Court

Myanmar refutes Gambia's genocide claims at the UN's top court, arguing allegations against the Rohingya are unproven. Gambia accuses Myanmar of targeting Rohingya for destruction, while Myanmar cites legitimate counter-terrorism efforts. Supported by the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, this landmark case may set a precedent for similar legal battles globally.

On Friday, Myanmar contested allegations by Gambia at the United Nations' top judicial body, asserting that claims of genocide against the Rohingya minority lack substantial evidence. Gambia, supported by the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, initially brought the case to the International Court of Justice in 2019, arguing that Myanmar had orchestrated a destruction campaign targeting the Rohingya.

Ko Ko Hlaing, representing Myanmar, argued before the World Court that Gambia had not met its burden of proof, emphasizing that the decision should be based on established facts rather than unverified allegations. The accusations stem from a 2017 military operation displacing over 730,000 Rohingya to Bangladesh, amidst reports of killings and atrocities.

While Myanmar maintains the offensive was a legitimate reaction to militant attacks, Gambia's lawyers insist the military's actions reveal an intent to commit genocide. This case marks the ICJ's first full genocide hearing in over a decade, with implications for future international legal actions, such as South Africa's 2023 case against Israel.

(With inputs from agencies.)