UPDATE 4-Panama court voids CK Hutchison port contracts, clouding sales plan

The Supreme Court said that after "extensive deliberation", it found the laws and acts underpinning the concession contract between the state and Panama Ports Company for the development, construction, operation and management of the terminals at Balboa and Cristobal were unconstitutional. The ruling comes amid a growing U.S.-China ⁠rivalry over global ‌trade routes and is seen as ⁠a win for Washington, where President Donald Trump has pushed to curb Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, which carries about 5% of global maritime trade.

Panama's Supreme Court late on Thursday annulled key port contracts held by a subsidiary of Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison, leaving the future ownership of some Panama Canal operations unclear and possibly upsetting its ⁠plans to sell some terminals. Panama Ports Company, a CK Hutchison subsidiary, has held contracts since the 1990s to operate container terminals at the canal's Pacific and Atlantic entrances, separate from the waterway's operations.

The decision could disrupt CK Hutchison's proposed $23 billion sale of dozens of ports worldwide, including the Panamanian terminals, to a consortium ​led by BlackRock and Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC). CK Hutchison did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Reuters on the court's decision.

The conglomerate's ‍Hong Kong listed shares dropped 5.5% on Friday following the ruling, its largest one-day percentage fall in nine months. The Supreme Court said that after "extensive deliberation", it found the laws and acts underpinning the concession contract between the state and Panama Ports Company for the development, construction, operation and management of the terminals at Balboa and Cristobal were unconstitutional.

The ruling comes amid a growing U.S.-China ⁠rivalry over global ‌trade routes and is seen as ⁠a win for Washington, where President Donald Trump has pushed to curb Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, which carries about 5% of global maritime trade. The leading contenders to buy Hutchison's ‍ports, BlackRock and MSC, did not immediately reply to requests for comment from Reuters.

Trump had hailed the proposed deal to sell the ports, especially the Panamanian operations, as a victory ​since it would move the trading assets under majority U.S. ownership. However, China had threatened to block the deal for not being in its ⁠national interest. It had pushed for state-owned shipping company COSCO to take a controlling stake in the buyout deal, sources previously told Reuters.

CK Hutchison had been waiting for the Supreme Court to ⁠make a final ruling about the legal status of its contracts after the local attorney general determined the contracts "unconstitutional". Critics of the contracts, which were extended in recent years, also argued they disadvantaged Panama.

The Supreme Court's decision could force the country to restructure the legal framework needed to hold port operations contracts and ⁠potentially require new tenders to operate the terminals. Ensuring uninterrupted port operations is critical for shipping lines that rely on Panama as a transshipment hub, where containers ⁠are transferred between vessels serving multiple routes.

In ‌July, Panamanian President Jose Raul Mulino said public-private partnerships could take over the two ports if the court invalidated the contracts with CK Hutchison. Analysts have flagged the likelihood Panama Ports will lodge an arbitration complaint after losing the ⁠case.

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)