Kerala's Sabarimala Dilemma: Constitutional Conundrum and Faith

The Kerala government addresses the complexities surrounding women's entry into Sabarimala Temple. State Law Minister P Rajeev highlights constitutional challenges and emphasizes protecting believers' faith, while awaiting the Supreme Court's review of petitions. A nine-judge bench will scrutinize the issues, with hearings commencing on April 7.

The Kerala government is carefully navigating the controversial issue of women entering the Sabarimala Temple, highlighting constitutional complexities involved. State Law Minister P Rajeev stated that the government must consider believers' faith while awaiting a Supreme Court review. The court's decision to tackle a series of related petitions involves addressing seven pressing constitutional questions.

Rajeev emphasized that the government is not rushing to a decision, as significant legal and cultural factors are at play. An earlier suggestion for a commission of experts in Hindu beliefs was not undertaken by the court, yet the government's proposal remains on record. He underscores the importance of a comprehensive understanding before taking any stand.

The Supreme Court, acknowledging the significance of the matter, has dedicated a nine-judge bench to deliberate on these petitions. The hearings are scheduled to start on April 7 and are expected to run through April 22, with parties requested to submit written arguments by March 14. This includes considering broader issues of discrimination against women in religious contexts, encompassing the Sabarimala Temple case.

(With inputs from agencies.)