Operation Tandoor vs. Operation Sindoor: A Call for Decisive Action

In a fiery debate in Lok Sabha, Samajwadi Party MP Ramashankar Rajbhar criticized the government for its delayed response to the Pahalgam terror attack. He questioned the 17-day delay in launching Operation Sindoor, arguing that the country demanded a swifter and more aggressive response dubbed Operation Tandoor.

During a heated session in the Lok Sabha, Samajwadi Party MP Ramashankar Rajbhar expressed vehement criticism over the government's inaction following the Pahalgam terror attack. He stated that citizens expected a forceful response, referred to as Operation Tandoor, targeting the terrorists responsible.

Rajbhar highlighted a significant delay in the deployment of Operation Sindoor, which occurred a full 17 days post-attack, far beyond the initial expectation of three days. He pointedly questioned whether the operation effectively targeted those directly involved in the incident.

Commending societal unity against the terrorist agenda, Rajbhar acknowledged the solidarity displayed by Hindus and Muslims alike. Additionally, he referenced former US President Donald Trump's assertions about facilitating an India-Pakistan ceasefire, a claim he suggested raises questions about international intervention and influence.