Controversy Over Snicko Technology in Ashes Series Intensifies
The Snicko technology used in the Ashes has come under scrutiny during the third test match. Controversies arose over its accuracy in decisions regarding dismissals, notably impacting England's games negatively. Human error has been cited as a reason for poor decisions, with the technology provider acknowledging mistakes.
The 'Snicko' technology faced renewed criticism during the Ashes third test on Thursday, after England's wicketkeeper Jamie Smith was controversially given out without the ball appearing to touch his bat. This follows a similar incident involving Alex Carey earlier due to operator error.
Despite unclear video evidence, a spike on Snicko registered a noise, leading to the dismissal decision handed down by the third umpire, Chris Gaffaney. The incident left England dismayed, as Smith's earlier reprieve on a separate appeal was due to similar technological uncertainties.
Cricket Australia boss Todd Greenberg slammed the errors, emphasizing the technology should eliminate major mistakes. BBG Sports, the provider, admitted a human error in audio processing, compounding criticism on the flawed decisions during the series. Australia's lead extends to 2-0 after previous victories.
(With inputs from agencies.)
- READ MORE ON:
- Snicko
- Ashes
- technology
- cricket
- controversy
- England
- Australia
- decision
- umpire
- error
ALSO READ
Veil Controversy: Bihar CM Faces Backlash Over Incident with Female Doctor
EU's High-Stakes Decision: Funding Ukraine Amidst Frozen Russian Assets Controversy
AAP's Dominance: A Sweeping Punjab Victory Amidst Controversy
Market Awaits: Bank of England's Decision Amid Economic Fluctuations
Snicko Stirs Controversy as England Falter in Ashes Showdown

