Head of fund created by Anne Frank's father criticises cold-case probe -paper

The head of a foundation set up by Anne Frank's father has criticised an investigation https://www.reuters.com/article/us-netherlands-anne-frank-betrayal-idUSKBN2JR0JM into her betrayal to the Nazis that named a Jewish notary as a leading suspect, saying it was "full of errors" and offered no proof, a Swiss newspaper reported.


Reuters | Vienna | Updated: 23-01-2022 16:04 IST | Created: 23-01-2022 15:58 IST
Head of fund created by Anne Frank's father criticises cold-case probe -paper
Anne Frank Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons
  • Country:
  • Austria

The head of a foundation set up by Anne Frank's father has criticized an investigation into her betrayal to the Nazis that named a Jewish notary as a leading suspect, saying it was "full of errors" and offered no proof, a Swiss newspaper reported. Anne and seven other Jews were discovered by the Nazis on Aug. 4, 1944, after hiding for nearly two years in a secret annex above a canal-side warehouse in Amsterdam. All were deported and Anne died in the Bergen Belsen camp at the age of 15. Her now-famous diary was later published by her father, Otto Frank.

A team including retired U.S. FBI agent Vincent Pankoke and around 20 historians, criminologists, and data specialists last week identified a relatively unknown figure, Jewish notary Arnold van den Bergh, as a leading suspect in revealing the hideout. A book detailing the findings was published on Tuesday. "It contributes not to uncovering the truth but to confusion and in addition it is full of errors," John Goldsmith, president of the Basel-based Anne Frank Fund https://www.annefrank.ch/en/fonds/history set up by Otto Frank, told Swiss newspaper Blick am Sonntag in an interview.

Some experts have emphasized that the evidence against Van den Bergh was not conclusive. Goldsmith said the team of researchers, which he called a commercial rather than academic undertaking, had not provided proof supporting their assertion. "This proof just has not been produced. Simply to disseminate an assertion that then in the public discussion becomes a kind of fact borders on a conspiracy theory," Goldsmith said.

"Now the main statement is: a Jew betrayed Jews. That stays in the memory and it is unsettling."

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Give Feedback