Court Advances Talc-Cancer Lawsuits Against Johnson & Johnson

A court-appointed special master has recommended allowing expert testimony linking Johnson & Johnson's talc products to ovarian cancer in ongoing lawsuits. This move could lead to trials in federal court, impacting over 67,500 claims. J&J disputes the link, maintaining their products are safe.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Updated: 21-01-2026 09:00 IST | Created: 21-01-2026 09:00 IST
Court Advances Talc-Cancer Lawsuits Against Johnson & Johnson
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.

In a significant development for ongoing litigation, a court-appointed special master has recommended allowing expert testimony linking Johnson & Johnson's talc-based products to cases of ovarian cancer. This recommendation pertains to more than 67,500 lawsuits filed in federal court in New Jersey.

The recommendation by retired U.S. District Judge Freda Wolfson supports plaintiffs in their assertion that J&J's baby powder can cause cancer. Judge Wolfson approved the admissibility of certain expert testimonies, stating the methodologies used by the experts abide by the scientific standards required by federal law.

Despite the setbacks, J&J maintains its products are safe and has switched from talc to cornstarch in its baby powder in the U.S. The company has faced numerous verdicts, some resulting in billions in damages, and continues to contest claims related to mesothelioma, another cancer allegedly connected to its talc products.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback