Nirav Modi's Extradition Appeal Hinges on Torture Risk Claims

Nirav Modi's extradition appeal hearing concluded in London with claims of torture risks in India. The court reserved judgment, and CPS argued against reopening the case. Modi, facing fraud charges, appeared via videolink, asserting India’s assurances are unreliable. The decision impacts future extradition between India and the UK.

The High Court in London has concluded a significant hearing related to fugitive diamond merchant Nirav Modi's extradition appeal. Modi, who is fighting charges of fraud and money laundering in India, presented claims that he could face torture during interrogations if extradited. The proceedings, which unfolded at the Royal Courts of Justice, saw Lord Jeremy Stuart-Smith and Justice Robert Jay reserving their judgment at the end of an intense day-long hearing.

Nirav Modi, appearing via videolink from prison, has been embroiled in a legal saga stretching over several years, linked to the USD 2 billion Punjab National Bank loan scam. His defence team underscored potential human rights violations, recalling precedents like the case of Sanjay Bhandari, who was discharged on similar grounds. They contended that India's assurances on Modi's treatment post-extradition are neither robust nor dependable.

The Crown Prosecution Service, representing the Indian authorities, countered these claims, urging the court to adopt a pragmatic approach. CPS emphasized existing protective measures and highlighted the implications for future extradition agreements should Modi's appeal be accepted. A decision in favor of the Indian government would pave the way for Modi's extradition to Arthur Road Jail in Mumbai.

(With inputs from agencies.)