Court Upholds Women's Rights Over 'Streedhan' in Landmark Ruling
The Allahabad High Court ruled that a wife cannot face criminal charges for taking her 'streedhan', quashing a case against Anamika Tiwari. The court affirmed that 'streedhan' belongs solely to the woman, and her husband or in-laws have no rights over it. The ruling came after accusations of dowry demands and a subsequent complaint by the husband.
- Country:
- India
The Allahabad High Court has delivered a significant ruling regarding women's rights, affirming that a wife cannot be tried under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code for taking her 'streedhan'.
In the case filed by Anamika Tiwari, the court observed that any property given to a woman during marriage, known as 'streedhan', remains her exclusive possession. The husband and in-laws have no claim over it. Justice Chawan Prakash's order, dated March 16, emphasized that a woman is the absolute owner of her 'streedhan'.
This decision followed complaints of dowry demands in Tiwari's marriage and a subsequent complaint by her husband, accusing her of taking money and jewelry. The ruling highlights the husband's moral obligation to return the 'streedhan' in times of distress but underscores that it ultimately belongs to the wife.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Delhi Court Acquits Family in Dowry Death Case: Lack of Evidence Key
Rajouri's Legal Camp Shines Spotlight on Dowry Menace
Court Acquits Family in Dowry Death Case, Points to Suicidal Tendencies
Occult Rituals and Dowry Demands: A Shocking Allegation
Delhi Court Acquits Man in Dowry Death Case Amid Hostile Testimonies

