UN Experts Question Military Trial in Acid Attack Case in Indonesia

The attack shocked human rights groups and civil society organisations, many of which viewed the incident as a serious assault on freedom of expression and human rights advocacy.

United Nations human rights experts have raised concerns over the handling of the acid attack case involving Indonesian human rights defender Andrie Yunus, calling for the matter to be transferred from a military court to the civilian justice system.

Yunus was attacked on 12 March 2026 in Central Jakarta shortly after recording a podcast discussing the growing role of the military in Indonesia's civil and political affairs. The assault left him with severe and permanent injuries, including serious burns affecting his eyes, skin and joints. Medical experts expect he will require long-term treatment and rehabilitation.

The attack shocked human rights groups and civil society organisations, many of which viewed the incident as a serious assault on freedom of expression and human rights advocacy.

Concerns Over Transparency and Accountability

Four members of the Indonesian National Armed Forces were arrested following the attack and later charged. Their trial began before Military Court II-08 Jakarta on 29 April 2026. UN experts argue that using a military court to prosecute a violent attack against a civilian creates significant concerns about transparency, independence and accountability. They warned that military justice systems have historically faced criticism for limited public access and for failing to adequately address responsibility beyond those directly accused of carrying out offences.

According to the experts, handling the case through military proceedings risks reinforcing long-standing concerns about impunity in cases involving military personnel. They believe a civilian court would provide greater public scrutiny and stronger guarantees of impartial justice.

Calls for Broader Investigation

The experts also questioned the decision to charge the defendants with "premeditated aggravated assault," arguing that the accusation does not fully reflect the gravity of an attack that caused life-threatening and permanent injuries.

They expressed concern over suggestions that the incident stemmed from a personal dispute, saying such a narrative could divert attention from the possibility of broader planning or involvement by others. Human rights advocates have repeatedly called for investigators to identify any individuals who may have ordered, organised or encouraged the attack.

The UN experts are urging Indonesian authorities to investigate and prosecute the case within the civilian justice system while ensuring full transparency throughout the process. They have also called for continued protection and specialised medical support for Yunus as he recovers from his injuries. The experts remain engaged with the Indonesian Government and continue to monitor developments closely. They say the outcome of the case will be closely watched as a test of accountability and the protection of human rights defenders in Indonesia.