Supreme Court Rejects Tata Consultancy's $168 Million Appeal

The U.S. Supreme Court dismissed Tata Consultancy Services' appeal on a $168 million award to DXC Technology for alleged trade secret theft. The verdict stems from Tata's purported use of proprietary software knowledge to build a rival platform. The court upheld previous rulings on compensatory and punitive damages.

Supreme Court Rejects Tata Consultancy's $168 Million Appeal
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined India-based Tata Consultancy Services' attempt to overturn a $168 million verdict in favor of DXC Technology for allegedly misappropriating trade secrets related to life-insurance software.

Tata sought the reversal following a lower court's decision affirming a $56 million compensatory and $112 million punitive damages award to DXC. This award, which Tata claims is unjustified under U.S. trade secret laws, was rooted in alleged conduct tied to a rival life-insurance platform.

Tata's appeal challenged the damages asserting no proof of actual losses by DXC. However, the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the decision, reaffirmed by the Supreme Court, concluding the actions constituted unjust enrichment.

Give Feedback

Use this form for editorial or site feedback. We usually reply within 2 to 3 working days.

By submitting, you agree that we may use your email address to respond.