Study reveals babies can tell who has close relationships based on saliva

In a new study, researchers have shown that babies expected people who share saliva, to come to one another's aid when one person is in distress.


ANI | Cambridge (England) | Updated: 21-01-2022 19:05 IST | Created: 21-01-2022 19:05 IST
Study reveals babies can tell who has close relationships based on saliva
Representative Image. Image Credit: ANI
  • Country:
  • United Kingdom

In a new study, researchers have shown that babies expected people who share saliva, to come to one another's aid when one person is in distress. The findings suggested that babies determined whether two people have a strong relationship and a tendency to help, based on whether those two people kiss, share food, or have other interactions that involve sharing saliva.

MIT postdoc Ashley Thomas is the lead author of the study, which was published in the journal 'Science'. Brandon Woo, a Harvard University graduate student; Daniel Nettle, a professor of behavioral science at Newcastle University; and Elizabeth Spelke, a professor of psychology at Harvard, are also authors of the paper. "Babies don't know in advance which relationships are the close and morally obligating ones, so they have to have some way of learning this by looking at what happens around them," said Rebecca Saxe, the John W. Jarve Professor of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, a member of MIT's McGovern Institute for Brain Research, and the senior author of the new study.

In human societies, people typically distinguished between "thick" and "thin" relationships. Thick relationships, usually found between family members, featured strong levels of attachment, obligation, and mutual responsiveness. Anthropologists have also observed that people in thick relationships were more willing to share bodily fluids such as saliva. "That inspired both the question of whether infants distinguish between those types of relationships, and whether saliva sharing might be a really good cue they could use to recognize them," Thomas said.

To study those questions, the researchers observed toddlers (16.5 to 18.5 months) and babies (8.5 to 10 months) as they watched interactions between human actors and puppets. In the first set of experiments, a puppet shared an orange with one actor, then tossed a ball back and forth with a different actor. After the children watched these initial interactions, the researchers observed the children's reactions when the puppet showed distress while sitting between the two actors. Based on an earlier study of nonhuman primates, the researchers hypothesized that babies would look first at the person whom they expected to help. That study showed that when baby monkeys cried, other members of the troop would look to the baby's parents as if expecting them to step in.

The MIT team found that the children were more likely to look toward the actor who had shared food with the puppet, not the one who had shared a toy when the puppet was in distress. In the second set of experiments, designed to focus more specifically on saliva, the actor either placed her finger in her mouth and then into the mouth of the puppet, or placed her finger on her forehead and then onto the forehead of the puppet. Later, when the actor expressed distress while standing between the two puppets, children watching the video were more likely to look toward the puppet with whom she had shared saliva.

The findings suggested that saliva sharing was likely an important cue that helped infants to learn about their own social relationships and those of people around them, the researchers say. "The general skill of learning about social relationships is very useful," Thomas says. "One reason why this distinction between thick and thin might be important for infants, in particular, especially human infants, who depend on adults for longer than many other species, is that it might be a good way to figure out who else can provide the support that they depend on to survive."

The researchers did their first set of studies shortly before Covid-19 lockdowns began, with babies who came to the lab with their families. Later experiments were done over Zoom. The results that the researchers saw were similar before and after the pandemic, confirming that pandemic-related hygiene concerns did not affect the outcome. "We actually know the results would have been similar if it hadn't been for the pandemic," Saxe said. "You might wonder, did kids start to think very differently about sharing saliva when suddenly everybody was talking about hygiene all the time? So, for that question, it's very useful that we had an initial data set collected before the pandemic."

Doing the second set of studies on Zoom also allowed the researchers to recruit a much more diverse group of children because the subjects were not limited to families who could come to the lab in Cambridge during normal working hours. In future work, the researchers hoped to perform similar studies with infants in cultures that have different types of family structures. In adult subjects, they planned to use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study what parts of the brain were involved in making saliva-based assessments about social relationships. (ANI)

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Give Feedback