Supermac Group fined after worker paralyzed at workplace

In a reserved decision released by the Tauranga District Court yesterday, Supermac Group Resources Limited was also ordered to pay reparation of $238,000 following the incident on May 2016.


Devdiscourse News Desk | North Island | Updated: 07-08-2019 08:17 IST | Created: 07-08-2019 08:17 IST
Supermac Group fined after worker paralyzed at workplace
The worker was not trained to use the boom lift and was not wearing a restraining harness as he was working – these are requirements clearly stated in the Best Practice Guidelines for Mobile Elevating Work Platforms. Image Credit: Pixabay
  • Country:
  • New Zealand

A North Island company was fined $304,750 today after a workplace incident on a mobile elevating work platform left a worker permanently paralyzed from the neck down.

In a reserved decision released by the Tauranga District Court yesterday, Supermac Group Resources Limited was also ordered to pay reparation of $238,000 following the incident on May 2016.

In the incident, a worker was unloading a boom lift from a transporter at a construction site in Kerikeri when the boom lift slipped off the transporter. The worker was catapulted from the boom lift and was left paralyzed and will never walk again.

The worker was not trained to use the boom lift and was not wearing a restraining harness as he was working – these are requirements clearly stated in the Best Practice Guidelines for Mobile Elevating Work Platforms.

WorkSafe’s Chief Inspector Specialist Interventions Hayden Mander said it is critical that when businesses are asking their workers to use any machinery, they ensure they’ve been trained to do so and follow all safety practices.

“We are seeing too many cases where workers are being injured because basic safety procedures laid down in the industry and regulatory best practice requirements are not being met.

“Risks involved in using machinery are very easy to identify, and too many businesses are failing in their duty to keep their workers safe by not putting controls in place to manage the risks. In this case, the business should have trained the worker before he was allowed onto the machine, and should have ensured that a safety harness was available and worn.

“These are easy things to do. Supermac’s failure to do them has left a worker paralyzed from the chest down and facing the future knowing he will never be able to walk again.”

Give Feedback