Irom Sharmila Critiques Presidential Rule in Manipur Amid Ethnic Crisis

Rights activist Irom Sharmila argues that the imposition of President's rule in Manipur is not a solution to ethnic violence but an evasion of democratic accountability. She calls for honest political efforts and the inclusion of a symbolic monarch to unite the state while proposing mini-assemblies for ethnic groups.

Rights activist Irom Sharmila described the imposition of President's rule in Manipur as a method to sidestep democratic accountability amid ethnic violence. In an interview, she stressed the importance of genuine political willingness to restore peace in the troubled state.

Sharmila proposed that Manipur's titular king be reinstated as a unifying figure and suggested forming mini-assemblies for the Meitei, Naga, and Kuki communities to ensure fair representation and direct funding. She insisted on respecting the values and practices of all ethnic groups in the region.

Sharmila criticized both the state and central governments for their ineffective handling of the situation, highlighting the lack of intervention by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. She advocated for immediate, decisive action and condemned former Chief Minister N Biren Singh's tenure, calling it a failure in restoring peace.

(With inputs from agencies.)