130th Amendment Sparks Democracy Debate

BSP leader Mayawati criticizes the 130th Constitutional Amendment Bill as potentially detrimental to democracy, urging a reconsideration. The Bill allows removal of key political figures if arrested for serious charges. Opponents argue it undermines the Constitution and federalism, while government defends moral accountability.

BSP supremo Mayawati has criticized the 130th Constitutional Amendment Bill, calling it a move that could potentially weaken the foundations of democracy in India. On Thursday, she urged the central government to reconsider the legislation.

The Bill, introduced amidst significant uproar in Parliament, proposes the removal of political figures like the prime minister and chief ministers if they face serious charges and are in custody for over 30 days. Critics, including Opposition members, decry it as a violation of constitutional principles.

Despite the backlash, Union Home Minister Amit Shah advocates for the Bill, citing the need for moral integrity in public office. He dismissed claims that the Bill is anti-federal, emphasizing that legal accountability should take precedence in governance.

(With inputs from agencies.)