Bombay High Court: Streaming Subject to Judges' Consent
The Bombay High Court issued a notice that live streaming of its proceedings will require the presiding judge's consent, following its initial implementation earlier this year. This move is part of efforts to improve judicial transparency, but recent incidents, such as a fabricated courtroom video, have raised concerns.
- Country:
- India
The Bombay High Court has announced that live streaming of its proceedings will now depend on the presiding judge's consent. This decision comes months after the court initiated live streaming as a measure to enhance transparency and public access to legal processes.
According to a notice issued by the Bombay High Court, the judge is authorized to allow access to copies of the streamed recordings. This regulation aligns with the court's established rules, stipulating that all proceedings be streamed 'subject to consent of the Judge/Judges'.
The notice coincided with Chief Justice of India B R Gavai addressing concerns over a misleading video on social media, which inaccurately depicted a disruptive incident in his courtroom. The court's decision to potentially limit streaming follows its earlier move in July when live broadcasting began from select benches. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has been streaming its proceedings since last year, reflecting a broader trend toward courtroom accessibility.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Power Struggle at the Supreme Court: Roberts and the Unitary Executive Theory
Chief Justice Surya Kant's Vision for a People-Centric Supreme Court
Shaping Free Speech: The Supreme Court's Constitutional Journey
UPDATE 1-US Supreme Court revives pro-Republican Texas voting map
UPDATE 2-US Supreme Court revives pro-Republican Texas voting map

