Devdiscourse
Development News Edition
Give Feedback
VisionRI - Urban Development

EC to Madras HC: VVPAT machines to be used with all EVMs in Lok Sabha polls


Devdiscourse News Desk chennai India
Updated: 06-02-2019 00:03 IST
EC to Madras HC: VVPAT machines to be used with all EVMs in Lok Sabha polls

After the EC's submission assuring 100 per cent use of VVPAT machines, the bench dismissed the petition. Image Credit: Wikimedia

Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail.machines would be used with all electronic voting machines in the coming Lok Sabha election, the Election Commission informed the Madras High Court Tuesday. The commission's counsel Niranjan Rajagopal made the submission before a bench comprising justices S Manikumar and Subramonium Prasad on a PIL seeking a direction to the EC to use VVPAT machines in all constituencies in the general election, expected in April-May.

After the EC's submission assuring 100 per cent use of VVPAT machines, the bench dismissed the petition. VVPAT or paper trail machine is a device that dispenses a slip with the symbol of the party for which a person has voted for. The slip appears on a small window for seven seconds and then drops in a box. But the voter cannot take it home.

Petitioner S Packiaraj submitted that there had been complaints about tampering of EVMs and the EC had introduced VVPATs in select constituencies. The EC's counsel submitted that the Supreme Court has passed an order in 2013 for use of VVPAT machines and the commission has been implementing it in a phased manner.

A decision was taken to 100 per cent implementation of VVPAT system in the 2019 election at an all-party meeting convened by the EC in 2017. Consequently, the EC on September 19, 2017, issued a circular to the chief electoral officers of states and Union territories that VVPAT machines shall be used with EVMs in all polling stations in all future elections to Parliament and state assemblies conducted using EVMs, he said.

Concurring with the submission, the bench noted that the EC had implemented the Supreme Court order and held that the apprehension of the writ petitioner was ill-founded. "There is no manifest illegality in the impugned communication. Writ petition deserves to be dismissed," it said in its order.

(With inputs from agencies.)

COUNTRY : India

POST A COMMENT