Smita Ghosh: Defending Birthright Citizenship in Landmark Supreme Case

Smita Ghosh, an Indian-American lawyer, presents arguments to the US Supreme Court against President Donald Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship. Her work challenges the order by highlighting constitutional history and pre-14th Amendment legal precedents. Ghosh's career spans academia, civil rights advocacy, and constitutional law practice.

Smita Ghosh, an Indian-American attorney, is playing a pivotal role in opposing US President Donald Trump's executive order that aims to rescind birthright citizenship. Acting as an amicus curiae, Ghosh is part of a legal team preparing arguments for the US Supreme Court, emphasizing the constitutional protections enshrined in the 14th Amendment.

Ghosh, a senior appellate counsel at the Constitutional Accountability Centre (CAC), argues that revoking birthright citizenship would contravene established legal principles validated even before the 14th Amendment's ratification. She references an 1844 ruling supporting her stance that the legal framework for citizenship was already in place.

With extensive experience in academia and as a civil rights advocate, Ghosh's contributions extend to previous roles at Georgetown University, the NAACP Legal Defence and Educational Fund, and other key institutions. Her expertise is crucial as the case unfolds, given its potential to redefine citizenship in the United States.

(With inputs from agencies.)