BJP's BL Santhosh welcomes SC's decision to refer Sabarimala review petitions to larger bench

BJP National General Secretary BL Santhosh on Thursday welcomed the Supreme Court's decision to refer to a larger constitution bench a batch of review petitions against its September 2018 verdict allowing entry of women of all age groups into the Sabarimala temple.


ANI | New Delhi | Updated: 14-11-2019 12:03 IST | Created: 14-11-2019 12:03 IST
BJP's BL Santhosh welcomes SC's decision to refer Sabarimala review petitions to larger bench
BL Santhosh (File Photo). Image Credit: ANI
  • Country:
  • India

BJP National General Secretary BL Santhosh on Thursday welcomed the Supreme Court's decision to refer to a larger constitution bench a batch of review petitions against its September 2018 verdict allowing entry of women of all age groups into the Sabarimala temple. "Sabarimala issue referred to larger bench... Welcome decision of SC in the direction of protecting rights of devotees and upholding faith... It was never a matter of fundamental rights... It was a matter of age-old tradition accepted by society... @BJP4Keralam," Santhosh tweeted.

While Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman and Justice DY Chandrachud dissented, Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Indu Malhotra sent the Sabarimala review to a larger Bench by a 3-2 ruling. A Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi had passed the order on a series of petitions seeking reconsideration of its September 2018 judgment that lifted the bar on menstruating women from worshipping in the Sabarimala temple in Kerala.

The apex court in a 4:1 ruling had set aside decades-old restrictions on the entry of women of age between 10 to 15 years inside the temple. One of the five Judges, Justice Indu Malhotra had, however, dissented and ruled that judges should not impose their personnel views.

The verdict had sparked a series of protests across the state. This lead to the filing of 65 petitions seeking review of the top court's order. The petitions challenged the authority of the court to intervene in a belief of the people. It argued that the Sabarimala deity is a "Brahmachari" (celibate) and "centuries-old beliefs" should not be disturbed by the entry of menstruating women worshippers. (ANI)

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Give Feedback