Adoption of Green Technologies in Farming: The Impact of Government Policies and Information Sharing

CoE-EDP, VisionRICoE-EDP, VisionRI | Updated: 16-06-2024 14:50 IST | Created: 16-06-2024 14:50 IST
Adoption of Green Technologies in Farming: The Impact of Government Policies and Information Sharing
Rrepresentative image

In a comprehensive study by Huazhong Agricultural University, China, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, and Emlyon Business School, France researchers explore how government subsidies and information sharing influence farmers' adoption of green technologies within a vertical agricultural supply chain. This research highlights that while subsidies and precise information can encourage the adoption of green technologies, they do not always improve farmer welfare, particularly when production diseconomies are present. This suggests that information and monetary incentives can sometimes substitute for each other. Risk aversion among farmers plays a crucial role in their technology adoption decisions, with risk-averse farmers preferring traditional methods under either very low or very high risk conditions.

Global Efforts and Challenges in Green Technology Adoption

The introduction of the study underscores global governmental efforts to promote green technologies for sustainable agricultural development. Despite these efforts, adoption rates remain low due to farmers' risk aversion and their hesitation to invest in new technologies. The study examines various governmental strategies to encourage adoption, including direct monetary subsidies and indirect approaches such as providing market information and agricultural advice.

Theoretical Model and Key Findings

The theoretical model developed in this study evaluates the roles of subsidies and information sharing in farmers' decisions to adopt green technologies. The model incorporates factors such as risk aversion, yield uncertainty, and production costs. Findings indicate that accurate information about market demand is vital for promoting green technology adoption, but it can sometimes be detrimental to farmer welfare if it leads to increased production costs. Additionally, information sharing can reduce the necessity for government subsidies, indicating a substitutive relationship between these two factors.

Complex Interplay of Risk Attitudes and Incentives

The research emphasizes the complex interplay between farmers' risk attitudes, government subsidies, and information sharing. It suggests that while information sharing generally promotes technology adoption, its benefits depend on the accuracy of the information and the level of production diseconomies. High subsidies are essential to incentivize adoption among highly risk-averse farmers. The study validates its model using U.S. Department of Agriculture cotton production data, providing practical insights for policymakers. These insights help design effective strategies that balance subsidies and information dissemination to promote green technology adoption in agriculture.

Information Sharing and Farmer Welfare

The research shows that while some literature suggests market demand information helps farmers adopt novel technologies, considering farmers' risk attitudes may lead to different findings. The study found that market demand information sharing does not necessarily always promote farmers' adoption of green technologies. Information sharing does not always improve welfare, as it can sometimes worsen conditions for farmers and society. Information sharing can hurt when farmers are motivated to take the same action leading to congestion or when the signal hints at a bad market outcome, causing farmers to be overly discouraged. Risk aversion may counteract these issues because farmers will resist taking extreme actions. Subsidies can mitigate the effects by increasing farmers' willingness to adopt even if the signal outcome is unfavorable.

Supply Chain Model Insights

The study establishes a vertical supply chain model between agricultural product distributors and farmers to analyze the impact of information sharing and government subsidies on technology adoption decisions. The model demonstrates that farmers are inclined to adopt traditional agricultural techniques when their risk aversion is either very low or very high. This nonmonotone pattern results from the interplay among risk aversion, government subsidies, and farmers' production cost concerns. When farmers are nearly risk neutral, the government is less willing to offer high subsidies, resulting in a higher reliance on farmers' fixed asset inputs, motivating them to choose traditional technologies instead. As farmers' risk-aversion attitudes increase, the government needs to pay more subsidies to encourage green technology adoption, beneficial in the intermediate range of risk aversion. For extremely risk-averse farmers, it becomes too cumbersome for the government to offer sufficient subsidies, leading to the potential forego of green technology adoption.

The study further finds that the government needs to spend more on subsidies to promote green technology adoption in scenarios without information sharing compared to scenarios with information sharing. Information provision and monetary subsidies are generally substitutes, but increased green technology adoption from more accurate information may be detrimental to farmer welfare when there are production diseconomies. Additionally, information sharing promotes farmers' technology adoption, but monetary subsidies may not always do so. Regarding water savings, the water-saving effect in the information sharing scenario is not always higher. When sharing market demand information, farmers better grasp the market demand situation, leading to varied water-saving effects depending on different scenarios.

Practical Implications for Policy Design

The research provides valuable insights into the combined impact of information provision and monetary subsidies on green technology adoption. By understanding the nuances of these influences, policymakers can create balanced strategies that effectively promote sustainable agricultural practices, considering the farmers' risk aversion and the accuracy of shared information.

  • Devdiscourse
Give Feedback