Supreme Court Showdown: Trump's Bid to Alter Birthright Citizenship

The Supreme Court hears arguments on the legality of Trump's directive to limit birthright citizenship, challenging the 14th Amendment's interpretation. The directive restricts citizenship for U.S.-born children if neither parent is a citizen or legal resident, sparking debates on immigration policy and constitutional rights.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court began hearing a case that could alter the long-standing understanding of birthright citizenship in the United States, with President Donald Trump in attendance. At the heart of the debate is Trump's executive order aiming to restrict automatic citizenship for children born in the U.S. whose parents are neither American citizens nor permanent residents.

U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer presented arguments supporting the directive, emphasizing that current citizenship policies undermine the value of American nationality. Historian Clare Cushman noted Trump's unprecedented attendance as a sitting president during these proceedings, signaling the administration's commitment to this controversial policy.

Political and public tensions continue to rise as demonstrators gathered outside the courthouse, reflecting widespread opposition to the proposed changes. Critics argue the move discriminates and conflicts with constitutional guarantees, while the administration maintains it is a necessary step to address 'birth tourism' and reinforce immigration controls.

(With inputs from agencies.)