Controversial 100-Metre Definition Threatens Aravali Hill's Integrity

Ajay Maken warns that the 100-metre definition of Aravali Hills could destroy the ecological barrier preventing desertification in northern India. The Supreme Court's new criteria for Aravali definitions may lead to extensive clearances, risking water resources and increasing vulnerability to environmental hazards. Concerns over tree felling in Uttarakhand echo broader environmental mismanagement.

Congress MP Ajay Maken has voiced concerns regarding the adoption of a 100-metre criteria to define the Aravali Hills, suggesting it could decimate the natural green wall that safeguards northern India from turning into desert.

The Supreme Court's recent acceptance of a uniform definition for the Aravali Hills, prohibiting fresh mining leases in affected areas, aims to protect these ancient formations. However, Maken argues that the stringent criteria will result in 99% of the Aravali Hills in Rajasthan being cleared, posing significant threats to regional water resources and increasing the risk of environmental instability.

Simultaneously, issues emerge in Uttarakhand, where Congress MP Ranjeet Ranjan criticizes the government's approval to fell 6,000 cedar trees in an eco-sensitive zone. Ranjan highlights the contradiction between promoting public tree planting and the extensive logging undertaken under the guise of development, raising alarms about the potential increase in landslides due to unchecked deforestation.

(With inputs from agencies.)