Development News Edition
Give Feedback
VisionRI - Urban Development

Congress involvement in Jallianwala trust may be removed with fresh BIll

Devdiscourse News Desk new delhi India
Updated: 13-02-2019 18:32 IST
Congress involvement in Jallianwala trust may be removed with fresh BIll

A bill to remove the Congress president as a permanent member in a trust that runs the Jallianwala Bagh National Memorial to make the body "apolitical" was passed in Lok Sabha Wednesday, amid a walkout by the opposition party. Replying to the debate on the Jallianwala Bagh National Memorial (Amendment) Bill, Culture Minister.Mahesh Sharma rejected Congress' allegation that the move was guided by "negative politics" of the government and said, "the way it (Jallianwala Bagh) should have been maintained, it was not done".

"The light and sound show was in in a bad state. We issued Rs 24 crore and improved its infrastructure," he stressed. The amendment states that it seeks to "delete" the mention of 'President of the Indian National Congress' as a trustee. It also paves way for the leader of the single largest opposition party in Lok Sabha to be a member of the trust. As of now, the only Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha is a member of the trust.

Hitting at the Congress, Sharma said, "Ask the people of the country that why your condition is such that you were not in a state to come as LoP (Leader of Opposition). It is not our fault." The present Lok Sabha has no Leader of the Opposition as no party as the requisite 10 per cent of the seats. "I hereby question why there should be a political party head there (trust)... Why the head of a political party?" the minister said.

"In the interest of the country and rising above party lines, whatever steps we have taken are in the interest of the country," the minister said. The bill also confers power to the central government to terminate the term of a nominated trustee before the expiry of the term without assigning any reason.

Objecting to the bill, the Congress staged a walked out. "This piece of legislation has been brought by the government... to remove the Congress president from that trust. Only for that purpose...this is a clear cut negative politics... We are walking out," K C Venugopal (Congress) said.

As of now, the trust which manages the memorial has the Prime Minister as the chairperson, President of Indian National Congress, Culture Minister, Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, Punjab governor and Punjab CM as its members. Virendra Kataria, Ambika Soni and Harvendra Singh Hanspal are nominated trustees appointed in 2013 for five years, according to the Culture Ministry website.

Jallianwala Bagh memorial was established in 1951 by the central government to mark the massacre of April 13, 1919, under British rule when troops under the command of Col Reginald Dyer fired on unarmed people who had gathered there on the occasion of Baisakhi festival. Participating in the debate, Shashi Tharoor (Cong) said that the government should not remove Congress president from the memorial trust as the party has an intimate connection with the Jallianwala Bagh massacre.

"This government has been betraying India...they are betraying the history of the country... they have neglected the monument and there is not enough money for running sound and light programme," he claimed. Sugata Bose (TMC) said, "We should rise above party line in order to honour martyrs of the massacre...let's leave party bickering behind us."

Asking the government to make amendments to the clause that seeks to remove the trustee of the panel without giving any reason, Bhartruhari Mehtab (BJD) said it is against natural justice. Expressing disappointment over the cancellation of light and sound programme at the monument, M P Rajesh (CPM) said the government should look at the issue. Opposing the Bill, he alleged it is an attempt to rewrite the history.

The government should seek an apology from the British government on the massacre, he said. Prem Singh Chandumajara (SAD) too demanded an apology from the UK for the massacre under the British rule.

(With inputs from agencies.)