AI in classrooms: Enhancing learning while preserving natural human presence

AI technologies such as virtual tutors, adaptive learning platforms, and automated grading systems are becoming ubiquitous in modern classrooms. These tools promise enhanced efficiency, equity, and engagement by tailoring instruction to individual needs and freeing educators from repetitive tasks. However, they also risk reducing the role of human educators and fostering an over-reliance on technology.


CO-EDP, VisionRICO-EDP, VisionRI | Updated: 25-01-2025 17:26 IST | Created: 25-01-2025 17:26 IST
AI in classrooms: Enhancing learning while preserving natural human presence
Representative Image. Credit: ChatGPT

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into education is transforming the way students learn and educators teach, offering unparalleled opportunities to personalize instruction, automate administrative tasks, and expand access to knowledge. However, this technological revolution comes with its challenges, particularly the potential to diminish the critical human presence in classrooms.

In a study titled “A Conceptual Ethical Framework to Preserve Natural Human Presence in the Use of AI Systems in Education”, Werner Alexander Isop explores how a human-centric approach can ensure the ethical deployment of AI in education. Published in Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, the study provides a detailed roadmap to balance AI’s potential while safeguarding the irreplaceable value of human interactions.

The dilemma of AI in education

AI technologies such as virtual tutors, adaptive learning platforms, and automated grading systems are becoming ubiquitous in modern classrooms. These tools promise enhanced efficiency, equity, and engagement by tailoring instruction to individual needs and freeing educators from repetitive tasks. However, they also risk reducing the role of human educators and fostering an over-reliance on technology. This could undermine the interpersonal connections, empathy, and trust that form the foundation of meaningful education.

The study emphasizes that existing high-level ethical guidelines for AI, such as the European Union’s “Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI,” often lack actionable details for specific domains like education. This gap can lead to inconsistent implementation, where AI systems inadvertently displace human actors or compromise ethical standards. To address this, Isop proposes a Unified Modeling Language (UML)-based framework that provides granular guidelines tailored to educational contexts, ensuring that AI systems enhance rather than replace the natural presence of humans in learning environments.

Building an ethical framework

Isop’s framework is built on the principles of trust, transparency, and accountability. It introduces low-level properties that define how AI systems should interact with human educators and learners, ensuring their roles remain distinct and complementary. Key components of the framework include:

Role Differentiation

One of the foundational aspects of the framework is the clear distinction between human actors (educators and learners) and AI systems. Educators retain their roles as mentors, facilitators, and moral guides, while AI systems are positioned as tools to assist and augment human efforts. This differentiation prevents the blurring of boundaries that could lead to AI systems overshadowing or replacing educators.

Multiplicity and Balance

The framework emphasizes maintaining a balanced presence of human and AI participants in educational settings. For example, while AI can facilitate group learning by providing real-time insights or resources, the human educator’s role in moderating discussions and fostering collaboration remains vital. By ensuring that AI supports rather than dominates the learning process, the framework preserves the richness of human interactions.

Visual Representation and Transparency

The study highlights the importance of AI systems being visually identifiable and non-intrusive. For instance, virtual AI tutors should not be designed to closely mimic human teachers in appearance or behavior. Clear visual cues help learners differentiate between AI and human actors, fostering trust and ensuring that interactions with AI systems remain transparent.

Behavioral Ethics

AI systems must adhere to ethical standards aligned with educational goals and human values. The framework outlines acceptable behaviors for AI systems, such as providing unbiased support, maintaining data privacy, and avoiding manipulative tactics. By defining these boundaries, the framework ensures that AI systems operate ethically and responsibly.

Ethical and unethical use cases

To illustrate the practical application of the framework, the study presents scenarios showcasing both ethical and unethical uses of AI in education.

Ethical scenarios include AI systems that assist educators by automating administrative tasks, enabling them to focus on personalized instruction and fostering student engagement. For instance, an AI platform that analyzes student progress data to recommend tailored learning strategies empowers educators without replacing their expertise.

Conversely, unethical use cases involve AI systems that entirely replace educators or mislead learners about their capabilities. For example, a virtual tutor designed to mimic a human teacher so closely that students cannot distinguish between the two undermines trust and accountability. Such designs risk eroding the interpersonal connections essential for effective learning.

Implications for education

The study underscores the importance of maintaining natural human presence in education, not merely as a safeguard against technological overreach but as a means to preserve the core values of trust, empathy, and accountability. Education is fundamentally a human endeavor, where relationships and emotional connections play a pivotal role in fostering curiosity, resilience, and ethical decision-making.

Isop’s framework provides actionable guidance for educators, policymakers, and technologists to integrate AI responsibly. By ensuring that AI systems complement human roles rather than supplant them, the framework helps create learning environments where technology amplifies, rather than diminishes, the human experience.

  • FIRST PUBLISHED IN:
  • Devdiscourse
Give Feedback