Poverty and cultural norms block education for rural girls

For many families, educating boys takes precedence over girls, reflecting both economic pragmatism and entrenched gender norms. Boys are often viewed as future earners, while girls are perceived as future dependents, making the financial burden of schooling for daughters harder to justify. Even when families manage to support girls’ education, government bursaries and public-sector resources remain inadequate, while private schools are financially out of reach for most households.


CO-EDP, VisionRICO-EDP, VisionRI | Updated: 04-09-2025 18:29 IST | Created: 04-09-2025 18:29 IST
Poverty and cultural norms block education for rural girls
Representative Image. Credit: ChatGPT
  • Country:
  • Pakistan

Despite decades of policy reforms and international advocacy for gender equality in education, thousands of girls in remote communities remain excluded from schools, their futures dictated by economic hardship and rigid traditions. The barriers are particularly acute in districts where limited infrastructure, deep-rooted patriarchy, and safety concerns converge to restrict not only access but also the very perception of education as a right for girls.

A study titled “Access to Education of Rural Girls in Pakistan,” published in a peer-reviewed journal, takes a closer look at these persistent inequalities. Focusing on three rural villages in the Thatta district of Sindh province in Pakistan, the research provides evidence of how economic deprivation and sociocultural pressures intertwine to create a cycle of exclusion that deprives rural girls of the opportunities education can bring.

Economic struggles limit educational opportunities

The study is based on 34 semi-structured interviews with students, parents, teachers, community leaders, and government officials to identify the economic challenges that keep girls out of classrooms. Families in rural Sindh are grappling with deep poverty, often prioritizing immediate survival over long-term investments in education. Declining agricultural incomes, worsened by water scarcity and a lack of employment opportunities, have left many households unable to afford basic educational expenses such as uniforms, transportation, and school materials.

For many families, educating boys takes precedence over girls, reflecting both economic pragmatism and entrenched gender norms. Boys are often viewed as future earners, while girls are perceived as future dependents, making the financial burden of schooling for daughters harder to justify. Even when families manage to support girls’ education, government bursaries and public-sector resources remain inadequate, while private schools are financially out of reach for most households.

The economic dimension of exclusion creates a cycle where girls in low-income households are locked out of opportunities, perpetuating intergenerational poverty and reinforcing the belief that education is not a priority for daughters.

Cultural and social norms reinforce exclusion

The research sheds light on deep-rooted sociocultural barriers that exacerbate educational inequalities. In the communities studied, patriarchal norms and caste systems dictate rigid gender roles that significantly limit girls’ autonomy and mobility. Families often hesitate to send girls to school due to safety concerns, including the risk of harassment during commutes or the threat of honour-based violence, which can result in severe social repercussions.

Early and forced marriages are also prevalent in the Thatta district, cutting short many girls’ educational journeys. In some cases, exchange marriages, arrangements made to settle disputes or strengthen tribal alliances, force girls into domestic roles at an early age. Once married, their opportunities for education diminish entirely, reinforcing the notion that girls’ futures are tied solely to household responsibilities.

Even when schools are accessible, social pressures and gendered expectations often prevent girls from attending consistently or progressing beyond basic education. Female teachers, who could act as role models and advocates for change, frequently face their own set of restrictions, limiting their ability to challenge the status quo or encourage families to prioritize girls’ education.

This combination of cultural pressures and safety concerns ensures that education for girls is treated as optional, rather than as a fundamental right, perpetuating their exclusion from academic and professional pathways.

Breaking the cycle: Pathways to inclusion

Improving access to education for rural girls in Pakistan requires multi-dimensional interventions that address both the economic and sociocultural barriers at play. The authors argue that policies and programs must work simultaneously at the household, community, and systemic levels to create meaningful change.

On the economic front, the authors recommend greater government investment in education infrastructure, along with expanded financial support for rural families through targeted bursaries and subsidies. By reducing the direct costs associated with schooling, families would be more likely to support their daughters’ education.

Addressing cultural barriers requires community engagement and awareness campaigns aimed at shifting perceptions around gender roles and the value of educating girls. Involving local leaders and influencers can help dismantle harmful stereotypes while fostering support for girls’ education as a driver of both personal empowerment and community development.

Safety remains another critical area for intervention. Improving transportation options, ensuring secure school environments, and increasing the presence of female educators can make education more accessible and acceptable to families concerned about security and cultural propriety. Empowering female teachers with leadership roles in rural communities can also amplify their influence, turning them into advocates for change at the grassroots level.

A call for systemic change

The findings from this study paint a clear picture of the urgent need for comprehensive, coordinated action to dismantle the systemic barriers holding rural girls back. Without targeted strategies to address poverty, gender bias, and entrenched sociocultural norms, progress will remain slow and uneven, leaving thousands of girls excluded from educational opportunities that could transform their futures.

The authors stress that education is a critical pathway to gender equality, economic empowerment, and broader social development. Ensuring rural girls have equitable access to learning is not only a moral imperative but also an essential step toward meeting national and international development goals, including the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) on quality education and gender equality.

The study also calls for further research and policy innovation to better understand localized challenges and tailor interventions to the unique contexts of rural communities. Solutions must be informed by ongoing dialogue with the communities themselves, ensuring that programs are culturally sensitive, practical, and sustainable.

  • FIRST PUBLISHED IN:
  • Devdiscourse
Give Feedback