UK court rejects libel suit from Russian over Steele dossier

Steele told the court at an earlier hearing that he felt “shock and horror” at BuzzFeed's “reckless” publication of the dossier, which he had been commissioned to compile by a Washington research firm. The judge said Gubarev “would have been entitled to substantial damages, if he had proved that the defendants are responsible in law for the publication complained of.

Britain's High Court on Friday dismissed a libel claim by a Russian businessman against the author of a report on US President Donald Trump's alleged links to Russia and Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Tech entrepreneur Aleksej Gubarev sued former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele and his firm Orbis Business Intelligence for what he said were "seriously defamatory allegations" that he had "knowing involvement" in the hacking of the Democratic National Committee's computer systems before the 2016 election.

Judge Mark Warby ruled that the references to Gubarev in the Steele dossier were defamatory and their publication "caused serious harm to his reputation." But he said Steele could not be held responsible for making the dossier public. It was published by BuzzFeed in January 2017. Steele told the court at an earlier hearing that he felt "shock and horror" at BuzzFeed's "reckless" publication of the dossier, which he had been commissioned to compile by a Washington research firm.

The judge said Gubarev "would have been entitled to substantial damages, if he had proved that the defendants are responsible in law for the publication complained of. But he has failed to prove that.".

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)