Sarah Palin Secures New Trial in Defamation Case Against New York Times
Sarah Palin won a bid for a new trial against the New York Times over a 2017 editorial that she claimed was defamatory. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that several errors in the original trial led to this decision. Palin aims to prove the Times' malice.
In a landmark decision, Sarah Palin secured the right for a new trial against the New York Times on Wednesday, challenging a defamatory 2017 editorial. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found errors in the original trial.
The editorial had linked Palin to a 2011 mass shooting, which Palin claims was done with 'actual malice.' Circuit Judge John Walker asserted that District Judge Jed Rakoff made several errors, including the wrongful exclusion of evidence and improper jury instructions.
The case has garnered attention for its potential to challenge the 1964 New York Times v. Sullivan ruling, which sets a high bar for defamation cases involving public figures. Palin's legal team sees this as a step towards holding publishers accountable for misleading content.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Tragedy Strikes Birmingham: Mass Shooting Leaves Four Dead, 18 Injured
Colorado Jury Convicts Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa of 2021 Boulder Grocery Store Mass Shooting
Colorado Gunman Sentenced to Life Without Parole for Mass Shooting
Birmingham Officials Seek Public's Help in Mass Shooting Case
Officials in Birmingham, Alabama, plead with public for information on mass shooting and offer reward money, reports AP.