Ben & Jerry's Battle for Social Voice Amid Unilever's Trump Silence Directive
Ben & Jerry's filed a lawsuit against its parent company, Unilever, accusing it of imposing a silence on criticizing President Trump. The ice cream company claims this action undermines its independent board and social activism legacy as Unilever plans to spin off its ice cream brands.
Ben & Jerry's is embroiled in a legal battle with its parent company, Unilever, over claims that the multinational demanded silence on political criticism of U.S. President Donald Trump.
The lawsuit contends that Unilever's ice cream chief, Peter ter Kulve, imposed a sudden ban on issuing any statements that criticize Trump, during a restructuring period considered as an 'unprecedented time.'
Ben & Jerry's, renowned for its advocacy on social issues since its inception in 1978, argues that this restriction jeopardizes its independent governance. The company has sought to stop what it perceives as Unilever's attempt to dismantle its activism-focused board as Unilever gears up to spin off its ice cream brands.
ALSO READ
-
ILO Signs Three Partnerships to Turn Living Wage Promises Into Action for Workers
-
Lee Jae Myung's Diplomatic Milestones: Balancing Amidst Global Tensions
-
Diplomatic Moves: Takaichi's UN Meeting with Trump
-
Trade War Chessboard: Agriculture, Energy, and Rare Earths in Focus
-
High-Stakes Diplomatic Dance: Trump and Xi's Crucial Summit
Google News