Legal Tussle: Challenging the UAPA Amendments

The Delhi High Court is reviewing petitions challenging the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, focusing on provisions criminalizing membership in unlawful associations and amendments labeling individuals as terrorists. Critics argue these changes infringe on fundamental rights. The hearing includes cases transferred from the Supreme Court and involves various petitioners and advocacy groups.

The Delhi High Court on Monday demanded the Centre's response on legal challenges against provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. The act faces criticism for criminalizing association memberships deemed unlawful.

A bench including Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela addressed petitions transferred from the Supreme Court, highlighting contentions against amendments that allow labeling individuals as terrorists and restraining property.

Senior advocate Arvind Datar, representing the Foundation for Media Professionals, voiced concerns about journalists jailed under the UAPA, underscoring implications on fundamental rights and democracy.