Civic Clash: Bulldozing Unlawful Structures Amid High Court Intervention in Nagpur

In Nagpur, local authorities demolished the residence of Fahim Khan, accused in a communal violence case, citing illegal construction. The Bombay High Court intervened, issuing a stay on further demolitions. The violence, prompted by misinformation, led to injury of police personnel, sparking a stern governmental response.

In a controversial move in Nagpur, local authorities demolished the two-storey residence of Fahim Khan, accused of masterminding the March 17 communal violence. The demolition, allegedly due to illegal construction, proceeded under heavy police presence and drone surveillance.

Shortly after the action began, the Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench issued a stay, citing procedural lapses and criticizing the administration for bypassing hearings. The court noted that Khan's property had already been razed prior to intervention, prompting a halt on other targeted demolitions. Legal representatives argue potential damages if wrongdoing by authorities is confirmed.

The communal unrest in Nagpur was fueled by rumors surrounding a religious artifact. Maharashtra's government, citing the injuries of 33 officers amid the riots, has indicated stringent measures against perpetrators. Authorities have faced criticism for potentially abusing demolition practices recently restricted by Supreme Court guidelines.

(With inputs from agencies.)