Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling: Redefining Stray Dog Policies
Former Union minister Vijay Goel praised the Supreme Court's order to remove stray dogs from public places, citing risks to tourism. The court's decision addresses rising dog bite incidents by directing the relocation of stray animals. Goel supports adoption and calls for a 'no street dogs' policy.
- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court's directive to remove stray dogs from public spaces has been hailed as 'historic' by former Union minister Vijay Goel, who argues that the presence of such animals poses a threat to the tourism industry.
Goel, known for his efforts against stray dogs, has long advocated for their removal from areas such as housing societies, parks, airports, and tourist destinations. He cites a recent incident where foreign coaches were bitten at a major sports venue as detrimental to India's image.
The court also noted an alarming increase in dog attacks at places like educational centers and hospitals, ordering the relocation of these animals to shelters. Goel encourages dog lovers to adopt and care for these animals in proper facilities.
ALSO READ
-
Supreme Court Seeks Centre's Response on West Bengal Woman's Alleged Deportation
-
Supreme Court Greenlights Removal of Invasive Species in Delhi's Central Ridge
-
Supreme Court Grants Bail to Imaan Mazari: A Victory for Justice
-
Saving Romania's Strays: A New Dawn for Dogs
-
Supreme Court Demands Action: Unnatural Deaths in Manipur Relief Camps
Google News