Federal Court Upholds Deportation of Activist Mahmoud Khalil

A federal appeals court ruled against Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate and pro-Palestinian activist, supporting the U.S. government's efforts for his deportation. The court's decision may result in his re-detention, despite challenges based on constitutional rights. Khalil's case highlights tensions between immigration law and free speech.

In a significant legal development, a federal appeals court has ruled against Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate who has become a prominent figure in pro-Palestinian activism. The court upheld the U.S. government's push for deportation, stating that a district judge lacked the jurisdiction to order Khalil's release from immigration detention.

The 2-1 decision by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals emphasized that Khalil's claims should be addressed through the appeal of a removal order, rather than through a separate lawsuit. This precedent could impact many foreign students contesting deportation, tightening the legal avenues available to them.

Despite dissent from Judge Arianna Freeman, citing potential First Amendment violations, Khalil's legal team plans to appeal. The case underscores ongoing tensions between immigration policies and free speech rights, particularly concerning activists involved in contentious issues like the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

(With inputs from agencies.)