Rohingya survivors expect UN's highest court to find Myanmar committed genocide

Myanmar has denied accusations of genocide and said the 2017 offensive that forced at least 730,000 Rohingya ‍from their homes and into neighbouring Bangladesh was a legitimate counterterrorist operation. Speaking on Friday on the sidelines of a meeting ​of survivors of mass atrocities, Yousuf Ali, a 52-year-old Rohingya refugee who says he was tortured ⁠by the Myanmar military, said he believed the court would declare a genocide had been committed.

Rohingya survivors of the 2017 military crackdown in Myanmar expect the International Court of Justice, the United Nations' highest court, to rule the country ⁠committed genocide against them, they said on Friday. A judgment is expected in three-to-six months' time following three weeks of hearings at the court in the Hague that is also known as the World Court. The outcome ​of the case will have repercussions beyond Myanmar, including affecting South Africa’s genocide case at the ‍court against Israel over the war in Gaza.

GAMBIA BROUGHT THE CASE In their final submissions this week, lawyers for Gambia, a mainly Muslim country that brought the case, told the court that the only reasonable conclusion to be drawn from Myanmar's conduct is ⁠that it ‌intended to destroy the ⁠Rohingya as a group. Myanmar has denied accusations of genocide and said the 2017 offensive that forced at least 730,000 Rohingya ‍from their homes and into neighbouring Bangladesh was a legitimate counterterrorist operation.

Speaking on Friday on the sidelines of a meeting ​of survivors of mass atrocities, Yousuf Ali, a 52-year-old Rohingya refugee who says he was tortured ⁠by the Myanmar military, said he believed the court would declare a genocide had been committed. "The world has witnessed us suffering for so ⁠many years (... ) how we were deported, how our homes were destroyed and we were killed," he said.

A U.N. fact-finding mission concluded the offensive had included "genocidal acts" and survivors recounted killings, mass rape and ⁠arson. At the international court, Myanmar's lawyers said the fact-finding mission was biased and that its conclusions did ⁠not have the standard of ‌proof needed for a finding of genocide.

Gambia's Justice Minister Dawda Jallow asked the court to reject Myanmar's arguments and said a judgment declaring genocide would help ⁠to break Myanmar's "cycle of atrocities and impunities".