Judicial Battle: The Trump Administration's Immigration Detention Policies Unveiled
A Reuters review reveals judges ruled over 4,400 times against Trump's immigration detention policies, highlighting violations and an increase in ICE detainee numbers. Despite legal challenges, the administration persists, with numerous habeas lawsuits filed, causing significant pressure on the U.S. justice system.
The Trump administration's immigration detention policy faces significant legal challenges, as hundreds of judges have ruled against the unlawful detention of immigrants. A comprehensive Reuters review of court records indicates over 4,400 instances where courts found the government's practices to be illegal.
Despite these rulings, the number of detainees under ICE has soared to roughly 68,000, marking a staggering 75% increase since Trump assumed office. Conservative courts have at times sided with the administration, supporting its push for mass detentions, which activists decry as a deviation from longstanding legal interpretations.
This legal turmoil has resulted in thousands of habeas lawsuits, severely straining the justice system. The Department of Homeland Security continues to assert its actions under presidential mandates, while critics highlight the overwhelming burden on court resources and the government's alleged defiance of judicial orders.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
HCBA Challenges Supreme Court's Retired Judges Proposal
Over 8,600 complaint against sitting judges since 2016: Govt tells Lok Sabha
Bombay HC seeks details from police of any security audit done of court premises, judges' residences
SC Collegium approves proposal to appoint 7 additional judges as permanent in Kerala HC
Trump administration moves to fire new US attorney appointed by judges

