Building Climate-Resilient Transport Systems for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth

The World Bank’s Disaster and Climate-Resilient Transport Guidance Note outlines a life-cycle strategy to embed climate resilience into transport systems, promoting economic growth, equity, and sustainability. It emphasizes systemic planning, innovative technologies, and cross-sector coordination to transform infrastructure into enablers of long-term climate adaptation.


CoE-EDP, VisionRICoE-EDP, VisionRI | Updated: 03-06-2025 09:35 IST | Created: 03-06-2025 09:35 IST
Building Climate-Resilient Transport Systems for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth
Representative Image.

The Disaster and Climate-Resilient Transport Guidance Note by the World Bank is a timely and ambitious roadmap for reshaping how countries plan, design, and finance their transport systems in the face of intensifying climate risks. Developed in collaboration with GRID Engineers and guided by insights from premier research institutions like Rutgers University, Carnegie Mellon University, and the European Investment Bank, the report is a product of deep technical expertise and policy foresight. It responds to a pressing reality: low- and middle-income countries are losing between $391 billion and $647 billion every year due to transport disruptions caused by natural disasters. To counter this, the World Bank proposes a proactive shift toward transport systems that are not only resilient to shocks but can also support rapid recovery and long-term prosperity.

From Infrastructure to Systems: Embedding Resilience Across the Life Cycle

At the heart of the guidance note is a five-pillar life-cycle framework for embedding climate resilience at every stage of infrastructure development. These pillars, system planning and financing, engineering and design, operations and maintenance, contingency planning, and institutional coordination, offer a comprehensive approach that goes beyond simply building stronger roads or bridges. Instead, the report argues that transport networks should be treated as living systems that support economic mobility, access to essential services, and social inclusion. This system-oriented thinking demands that planners not only assess physical vulnerability but also understand the interdependencies among transport nodes, local economies, and critical services such as health and education.

The Economic Case: Resilience as a Development Multiplier

The guidance note emphasizes that resilience is not just a safety measure; it is a catalyst for development. The World Bank estimates that investing in climate-resilient transport could generate up to $4.2 trillion in global GDP by 2040, largely by improving access to markets and social services. In Sub-Saharan Africa, better infrastructure could reduce overland trade costs and unlock $250 billion in economic potential over 15 years. Similarly, the NH-5 highway in Vietnam helped reduce poverty in its surrounding regions by 35 percent between 1995 and 2000, while India’s NH-2 corridor saw literacy rates among women rise by 12 percent and female labor participation increase by 9 percent. These case studies make clear that climate-resilient infrastructure not only reduces risk but also enhances equity, boosts productivity, and opens up new economic frontiers.

Tools for Transformation: The Role of Smart Planning and Technology

A key feature of the report is its emphasis on using data-driven tools to guide investment decisions. The World Bank’s HARMA tool (Hazard & Risk Multi-Regional Assessment) exemplifies this approach. HARMA enables governments to assess exposure, simulate disaster scenarios, and evaluate adaptation strategies through robust cost-benefit analysis. In Pakistan, HARMA was used to compare two national highway adaptation strategies, one targeting extreme, rare events and another focusing on frequent hazards. The latter approach yielded far better returns, demonstrating that targeting more probable climate risks is not only more effective but also more financially prudent. Tools like HARMA are particularly valuable in low-data environments and can be adapted to assess multiple sectors or modes of transport.

The guidance also promotes the use of GIS-based smart asset management systems, predictive analytics for maintenance, and remote sensing for hazard monitoring. Technologies such as drones, sensors, and AI-driven decision-support platforms are recommended for both routine maintenance and rapid disaster assessments. Nature-based solutions, like vegetated slopes or mangrove buffers, are presented as low-cost and co-beneficial alternatives to conventional infrastructure, especially in rural and coastal settings.

Mobilizing Finance and Institutions for Resilient Futures

Beyond engineering solutions, the report highlights the importance of finance and institutional capacity. It advocates for integrating resilience into public-private partnerships (PPPs), using insurance schemes to protect infrastructure investments, and leveraging concessional finance from climate funds like the Green Climate Fund or the Adaptation Fund. Countries are encouraged to explore contingency finance tools such as catastrophe bonds, reserve funds, and emergency credit lines. These instruments can reduce fiscal strain after disasters and create a more predictable recovery pathway.

Equally important is the call for institutional reforms. The report urges national and local governments to improve coordination among transport authorities, meteorological services, emergency responders, and urban planners. Establishing protocols for early warning systems, harmonizing data standards across agencies, and training staff in emergency preparedness are all viewed as critical components of resilient transport systems. Furthermore, governments are encouraged to update design standards and planning codes to reflect evolving climate risks and ensure long-term sustainability.

A Global Call to Action with Local Impact

Ultimately, the Disaster and Climate-Resilient Transport Guidance Note is both a technical manual and a strategic manifesto. It speaks directly to planners, policymakers, engineers, and financiers, offering them the tools and rationale to embed resilience into every link of the transport value chain. But more than that, it issues a broader call to rethink how transport can serve as a pillar of climate adaptation, economic inclusion, and social cohesion. By investing in resilience today, countries can avoid the staggering costs of inaction and build a foundation for sustainable development in a climate-uncertain future. The stakes are high, but so are the opportunities. This document shows the world how to seize them.

  • FIRST PUBLISHED IN:
  • Devdiscourse
Give Feedback