SC declines urgent listing of plea challenging RBI decision on Rs 2,000 note exchange sans proof
The Supreme Court once again declined an urgent hearing of a plea challenging RBI's decision permitting citizens to exchange Rs 2000 banknotes, which are being pulled out of circulation, without any requisition slip and ID proof.
The Supreme Court once again declined an urgent hearing of a plea challenging the Reserve Bank of India's decision permitting citizens to exchange Rs 2000 banknotes, which are being pulled out of circulation, without any requisition slip and ID proof. A vacation bench of Justices Aniruddha Bose and Rajesh Bindal said another bench earlier had already directed for mentioning it before the Chief Justice of India after summer vacations.
Mentioning the matter for urgent listing, Upadhyay said there was a press conference and RBI Governor said 1.8 lakh crore notes have been exchanged in 10 days and this is all without any identity proof. As the bench was not inclined to list the matter before the vacation bench, the advocate said that by that time (in July when the court will re-open) entire black money of criminals, naxals, and mafias will be exchanged.
Last week also Upadhyay mentioned the matter for urgent hearing, however, the apex court declined his request saying the issue is not urgent and it would be taken up for hearing in July, after the re-opening of the court. He mentioned the matter on June 7 again and on that day it sought a report from its Registry on the issue of urgent listing of Upadhyay's plea and asked him to mention it again on June 9.
He has approached the apex court against the Delhi High Court order which dismissed a plea challenging RBI's decision permitting citizens to exchange Rs 2000 banknotes, which are being pulled out of circulation, without any requisition slip and ID proof. He moved the apex court against the May 29 order of the High Court which had dismissed his plea.
On May 19, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) announced it will pull out the Rs 2,000 denomination from circulation as part of a "currency management exercise". The RBI has given citizens time till September 30 to exchange these notes with those of other denominations. On May 20, the State Bank of India (SBI), too, instructed its local head offices that the facility of exchange of Rs 2,000 denomination banknotes to all members of the public up to a limit of Rs 20,000 at a time will be allowed without obtaining any requisition slip.
Seeking a stay on RBI and SBI's notifications, the advocate said that it gives an opportunity to legalise illegal money and hence contrary to the aims and objects of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Benami Transactions Act, Money Laundering Act, Lokpal and Lokayukta Act, CVC Act, Fugitive Economic Offenders Act and the Black Money Act. "Therefore, Court may stay the notifications so far as they permit the exchange of banknotes without requisition slip and identity proof," it has stated in its appeal before the top court.
The High Court dismissed Upadhyay'a plea saying, "This decision of the government is purely a policy decision and courts should not sit as an appellate authority over the decision taken by the government." Upadhyay sought a direction to ensure that people deposit Rs 2,000 notes in their "respective bank accounts only so that no one could deposit the money in others' bank accounts".
"A large amount of notes of this denomination has either reached in lockers of individuals or been "hoarded by separatists, terrorists, Maoists, drug smugglers, mining mafias and corrupt people", he has said in his plea before the High Court. The RBI has told the High Court that the withdrawal of Rs 2,000 notes is a "statutory exercise" and the decision to enable their exchange was taken for "operational convenience".
According to the RBI, the Rs 2,000 denomination banknote was introduced in November 2016 primarily to meet the currency requirement of the economy in an expeditious manner, after the withdrawal of the legal tender status of all Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 banknotes in circulation at that time. (ANI)
(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)