Supreme Court Questions Legality of Tree Cutting in Delhi Ridge Area

The Supreme Court directed the Delhi government to explain measures for compensating illegal tree felling in Southern Delhi's ridge forest. Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan questioned the role of LG VK Saxena and ordered officials to ascertain the number of such illegal permissions granted in the last five years.

The Supreme Court on Friday scrutinized a case involving illegal tree cutting in Southern Delhi's ridge forest area, commanding the Delhi government to outline its compensation plan for unauthorized tree removals. A bench consisting of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan demanded a detailed report on the number of illegal permissions granted over the past five years.

The court permitted government officers and Delhi Development Authority (DDA) officials to disclose whether Lieutenant Governor (LG) VK Saxena was aware that he needed the court's sanction for granting tree cutting permissions. Furthermore, the Supreme Court required the DDA to clarify whether it acted on the LG's directive independently or based on other considerations.

The case originated from a plea by Delhi resident Bindu Kapurea and others, including an NGO, alleging unauthorized tree felling despite a March 4 court order banning such actions. In May, the court launched a contempt case against DDA Vice-Chairman Subhasish Panda for defying its February order.

During Friday's proceedings, the bench expressed strong objections to the LG's unauthorized tree cutting permissions, noting a significant lack of oversight. Justice Oka remarked on the LG's apparent misconception of his authority, highlighting the need for court approval.

The court reiterated the necessity for the LG to seek permission, pointing out how the matter was obscured until Attorney General R. Venkatramani's appearance clarified the LG's involvement. The court found the LG’s assumptions about his power to authorize tree felling to be a grave oversight.

Additionally, the court demanded clarity on whether DDA officials had informed the LG about the need for judicial approval. The Contractor responsible for the illegal felling was also issued a notice to disclose the authority behind the directive.

In June, the court observed that the LG, in his role as DDA Chairman, had endorsed the tree felling proposal and even inspected the site. This prompted the court to seek records of the LG's visit and further initiate contempt proceedings. (ANI)