Delhi Student Challenges Legality of Entrance Test in Court
An 11-year-old student has filed an appeal with the Delhi High Court, arguing the illegality of an entrance test for Class VI at CM SHRI Schools. The appeal, represented by senior advocate Ashok Agarwal, claims the test violates the Right of Children to Free Education Act by enforcing prohibited screening procedures.
- Country:
- India
An 11-year-old student has taken legal action against the Delhi government's policy requiring an entrance test for Class VI admissions in CM SHRI Schools, arguing that it contravenes the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, 2009. Senior advocate Ashok Agarwal filed an appeal with the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court, challenging a previous decision by the Single Bench which upheld the legality of the admission test.
The student argues that the Single Judge failed to recognize the illegality of subjecting children to an admission test at the primary education level, which Section 13 of the RTE Act explicitly prohibits. The provision aims to protect children's fundamental right to free and equitable education, as ensured by Article 21-A of the Constitution.
The legal appeal states that the provision seeks to prevent exploitative practices like capitation fees and discriminatory screening processes in school admissions. Despite the Single Bench's ruling that considered CM SHRI Schools as 'specified category schools' not subject to this prohibition, the appellant contends this interpretation undermines the RTE Act's protective intent. The appeal is expected to be heard by the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court soon.
(With inputs from agencies.)

