Unyielding Protest Camp in Quetta Marks Over 6,000 Days Seeking Justice for Baloch Missing Persons
A persistent protest camp by Voice for Baloch Missing Persons outside Quetta Press Club has reached 6,031 days, demanding an end to enforced disappearances. The camp receives support from diverse individuals emphasizing the issue as a human rights crisis. Calls for justice and adherence to the rule of law remain strong.
- Country:
- Pakistan
The protest camp organized by Voice for Baloch Missing Persons (VBMP) in Quetta has now stretched into its 6,031st day, highlighting the ongoing crisis of enforced disappearances in Balochistan. Set up outside the Quetta Press Club, the camp continues to serve as a battleground for the return of missing persons. Supporters from various backgrounds have gathered to show solidarity with families of the disappeared, urging an immediate end to such practices, as emphasized by Baloch media outlet Zrumbesh.
Nasrullah Baloch, Chairman of VBMP, reiterated that the camp's extensive duration underscores the unresolved nature of enforced disappearances. He affirmed that the protest would not cease until all individuals are located and their families achieve justice. Alam of unrest persists in the region, with claims that state security agencies are behind unjust detentions, dating back two decades.
Human rights organizations have documented thousands of these cases, though official figures from the Pakistani government differ significantly. Bodies like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch continue to press for investigations and accountability. The Pakistani government's consistent denials clash with demands for transparency and justice, as families persevere in highlighting the need for legal adherence and human rights protection, as reported by TBP.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Tragic Loss Sparks Call for Justice: Racial Attack and the Fight for Truth in Dehradun
Arrest Made in Activist's Tragic Killing: Justice Awaits
Justice BV Nagarathna says Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act is unconstitutional, needs to be struck down.
Requirement of prior sanction is contrary to Prevention of Corruption Act; forecloses inquiry and protects corrupt: Justice Nagarathna.
Justice KV Viswanathan holds Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act constitutional, stresses need to protect honest officers.

